Silicon AnalyticaSK hynix vs Texas Instruments: revenue, margins and valuation
SK hynix and Texas Instruments share the integrated manufacturing (IDM) model: each designs and manufactures chips; factory utilisation, product mix and depreciation affect margins. Latest reported quarterly revenue: SK hynix ₩104.6T (≈US$78.2B) in Q3 2026; Texas Instruments US$6.1B in Q3 2026.
Valuation
Market cap
P/Slower is betterPeriods differ
Growth
Revenue growth
Peer median (20 companies): 46.5% · 18 with data
Profitability
Gross margin
Peer median (20 companies): 61.9% · 19 with data
Operating margin
Peer median (20 companies): 36.8%
Net margin
Peer median (20 companies): 30.7%
Diluted EPS
R&D % of revenue
Peer median (20 companies): 9.9% · 18 with data
Scale
Revenue
Operating income
Net income
R&D
Capex
Free cash flow
Net cash / net debt
EmployeesPeriods differ
Shares outstandingPeriods differ
| Metric | SK hynix | Texas Instruments | Peer median(20 companies) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valuation | |||
| Market cap | Leader. | ||
| P/Slower is betterPeriods differ | — | ||
| Growth | |||
| Revenue growth | Leader. | 46.5%18 with data | |
| Profitability | |||
| Gross margin | — | 61.9%19 with data | |
| Operating margin | Leader. | 36.8% | |
| Net margin | Leader. | 30.7% | |
| Diluted EPS | — | ||
| R&D % of revenue | — | 9.9%18 with data | |
| Scale | |||
| Revenue | Leader. | ||
| Operating income | Leader. | ||
| Net income | Leader. | ||
| R&D | — | ||
| Capex | — | ||
| Free cash flow | — | ||
| Net cash / net debt | — | ||
| EmployeesPeriods differ | |||
| Shares outstandingPeriods differ | |||
Growth
- Calculated Change versus the same period a year earlier.
View sources (2)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Texas Instruments: Investor relations - TI reports third quarter 2026 financial results and shareholder returns - Texas Instruments · Q3 2026 · published 21 Oct 2026
Profitability
- Calculated Gross profit ÷ revenue, GAAP/IFRS unless labelled otherwise.
View sources (1)
- Texas Instruments: Investor relations - TI reports third quarter 2026 financial results and shareholder returns - Texas Instruments · Q3 2026 · published 21 Oct 2026
Not shown: SK hynix: Gross profit (or cost of revenue) not stored for Q3 2026.
- Calculated Operating income ÷ revenue, GAAP/IFRS unless labelled otherwise.
View sources (2)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Texas Instruments: Investor relations - TI reports third quarter 2026 financial results and shareholder returns - Texas Instruments · Q3 2026 · published 21 Oct 2026
- Calculated Net income ÷ revenue for the same period (Silicon Analytica calculation unless the company states it).
View sources (2)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Texas Instruments: Investor relations - TI reports third quarter 2026 financial results and shareholder returns - Texas Instruments · Q3 2026 · published 21 Oct 2026
- Calculated R&D ÷ revenue for the same period.
View sources (1)
- Texas Instruments: Investor relations - TI reports third quarter 2026 financial results and shareholder returns - Texas Instruments · Q3 2026 · published 21 Oct 2026
Not shown: SK hynix: R&D expense not stored for Q3 2026.
Scale
- Calculated ≈US$ for non-US$ reporters uses the stored conversion for each value; reporting-currency figures are in the table view.
View sources (2)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Texas Instruments: Investor relations - TI reports third quarter 2026 financial results and shareholder returns - Texas Instruments · Q3 2026 · published 21 Oct 2026
Revenue mix
SK hynix
Loading…
Texas Instruments
Loading…
Each company's own classification and latest fiscal year with a stored split; categories differ between companies and are never added together.
Period ends — SK hynix: 30 Sep 2026 · Texas Instruments: 30 Sep 2026. Valuation multiples remain trailing.
Copper underline: the leader among values for comparable periods. Higher is better, except P/E and P/S, where the lower positive multiple leads. R&D, capex, employees and shares have no leader. Peer median uses the latest quarter of the 20 covered companies and is shown for ratios only. “—” means neither the figure nor its inputs are stored; hover or tap for the missing input. Values marked Calculated are Silicon Analytica calculations from stored reported figures.
How to read this comparison
Business models. These companies share the integrated manufacturing (IDM) model and are broadly comparable, subject to product mix and definitions. SK hynix designs and manufactures chips; factory utilisation, product mix and depreciation affect margins; Texas Instruments designs and manufactures chips; factory utilisation, product mix and depreciation affect margins.
Cyclicality. SK hynix (memory & storage) · Texas Instruments (integrated manufacturing (IDM)): earnings are sensitive to capacity, utilisation and the investment or demand cycle. Trailing multiples can be distorted by peak or trough earnings.
Accounting and periods. Latest reported quarter ends — SK hynix: 2026-09-30 · Texas Instruments: 2026-09-30. Each value retains its period, status and source; adjusted measures remain separate. Same-mode periods within 100 days are compared; valuation multiples remain trailing.
More comparisons
Micron vs SK hynixSamsung Electronics vs SK hynixSamsung Electronics vs Texas InstrumentsSK hynix vs IntelSK hynix vs NXP SemiconductorsIntel vs Texas InstrumentsTexas Instruments vs NXP SemiconductorsNVIDIA vs AMDASML vs Applied MaterialsArm Holdings vs Synopsys