Silicon AnalyticaSK hynix vs NXP: revenue, margins and valuation
SK hynix and NXP share the integrated manufacturing (IDM) model: each designs and manufactures chips; factory utilisation, product mix and depreciation affect margins. Latest reported quarterly revenue: SK hynix ₩104.6T (≈US$78.2B) in Q3 2026; NXP US$3.8B in Q3 2026.
Valuation
Market cap
Trailing P/Elower is better
P/Slower is better
Growth
Revenue growth
Peer median (20 companies): 46.5% · 18 with data
Profitability
Gross margin
Peer median (20 companies): 61.9% · 19 with data
Operating margin
Peer median (20 companies): 36.8%
Net margin
Peer median (20 companies): 30.7%
Diluted EPS
EPS (basic)
R&D % of revenue
Peer median (20 companies): 9.9% · 18 with data
Scale
Revenue
Operating income
Net income
R&D
Capex
Free cash flow
Employees
Shares outstandingPeriods differ
| Metric | SK hynix | NXP | Peer median(20 companies) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valuation | |||
| Market cap | Leader. | ||
| Trailing P/Elower is better | — | ||
| P/Slower is better | — | ||
| Growth | |||
| Revenue growth | — | 46.5%18 with data | |
| Profitability | |||
| Gross margin | — | 61.9%19 with data | |
| Operating margin | Leader. | 36.8% | |
| Net margin | Leader. | 30.7% | |
| Diluted EPS | — | ||
| EPS (basic) | — | ||
| R&D % of revenue | — | 9.9%18 with data | |
| Scale | |||
| Revenue | Leader. | ||
| Operating income | Leader. | ||
| Net income | Leader. | ||
| R&D | — | ||
| Capex | — | ||
| Free cash flow | — | ||
| Employees | — | ||
| Shares outstandingPeriods differ | |||
Valuation
- Calculated Price ÷ last four reported quarters of diluted EPS. Loss-making companies show N/M.
View sources (1)
- NXP: NXP SEC filings (XBRL company facts, Q2 2026 10-Q) · 9 Oct 2026 · published 28 Jul 2026
Not shown: SK hynix: No dated market figure stored.
- Calculated Market cap ÷ trailing-twelve-month revenue.
View sources (1)
- NXP: NXP SEC filings (XBRL company facts, Q2 2026 10-Q) · 9 Oct 2026 · published 28 Jul 2026
Not shown: SK hynix: No dated market figure stored.
Growth
- Calculated Change versus the same period a year earlier.
View sources (1)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
Not shown: NXP: Revenue for the same quarter a year earlier not stored.
Profitability
- Calculated Gross profit ÷ revenue, GAAP/IFRS unless labelled otherwise.
View sources (1)
- NXP: NXP Semiconductors Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results | NXP Semiconductors - Newsroom · Q3 2026 · published 27 Oct 2026
Not shown: SK hynix: Gross profit (or cost of revenue) not stored for Q3 2026.
- Calculated Operating income ÷ revenue, GAAP/IFRS unless labelled otherwise.
View sources (2)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
- NXP: NXP Semiconductors Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results | NXP Semiconductors - Newsroom · Q3 2026 · published 27 Oct 2026
- Calculated Net income ÷ revenue for the same period (Silicon Analytica calculation unless the company states it).
View sources (2)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
- NXP: NXP Semiconductors Form 10-Q — period ended 27 Sep 2026 · Q3 2026 · published 27 Oct 2026
- Calculated R&D ÷ revenue for the same period.
View sources (1)
- NXP: NXP Semiconductors Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results | NXP Semiconductors - Newsroom · Q3 2026 · published 27 Oct 2026
Not shown: SK hynix: R&D expense not stored for Q3 2026.
Scale
- Calculated ≈US$ for non-US$ reporters uses the stored conversion for each value; reporting-currency figures are in the table view.
View sources (2)
- SK hynix: SK hynix Announces Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results · Q3 2026 · published 28 Oct 2026
- NXP: NXP Semiconductors Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results | NXP Semiconductors - Newsroom · Q3 2026 · published 27 Oct 2026
Revenue mix
SK hynix
Loading…
NXP
Loading…
Each company's own classification and latest fiscal year with a stored split; categories differ between companies and are never added together.
Period ends — SK hynix: 30 Sep 2026 · NXP: 27 Sep 2026. Valuation multiples remain trailing.
Copper underline: the leader among values for comparable periods. Higher is better, except P/E and P/S, where the lower positive multiple leads. R&D, capex, employees and shares have no leader. Peer median uses the latest quarter of the 20 covered companies and is shown for ratios only. “—” means neither the figure nor its inputs are stored; hover or tap for the missing input. Values marked Calculated are Silicon Analytica calculations from stored reported figures.
How to read this comparison
Business models. These companies share the integrated manufacturing (IDM) model and are broadly comparable, subject to product mix and definitions. SK hynix designs and manufactures chips; factory utilisation, product mix and depreciation affect margins; NXP designs and manufactures chips; factory utilisation, product mix and depreciation affect margins.
Cyclicality. SK hynix (memory & storage) · NXP (integrated manufacturing (IDM)): earnings are sensitive to capacity, utilisation and the investment or demand cycle. Trailing multiples can be distorted by peak or trough earnings.
Accounting and periods. Latest reported quarter ends — SK hynix: 2026-09-30 · NXP: 2026-09-27. Each value retains its period, status and source; adjusted measures remain separate. Same-mode periods within 100 days are compared; valuation multiples remain trailing.
More comparisons
Micron vs SK hynixSamsung Electronics vs SK hynixSamsung Electronics vs NXP SemiconductorsSK hynix vs IntelSK hynix vs Texas InstrumentsIntel vs NXP SemiconductorsTexas Instruments vs NXP SemiconductorsNVIDIA vs AMDASML vs Applied MaterialsArm Holdings vs Synopsys