KLA vs Tokyo Electron: revenue, margins and valuation
KLA and Tokyo Electron share the equipment model: each supplies production or test equipment and services; customer investment and installed-base demand drive revenue. Latest reported quarterly revenue: KLA US$4.1B in Q1 FY2027; Tokyo Electron ¥935.1B (≈US$5.9B) in Q2 FY2027.
Valuation
Market cap
Trailing P/Elower is better
P/Slower is better
Growth
Revenue growth
Peer median (20 companies): 46.5% · 18 with data
Profitability
Gross margin
Peer median (20 companies): 61.9% · 19 with data
Operating margin
Peer median (20 companies): 36.8%
Net margin
Peer median (20 companies): 30.7%
Diluted EPS
EPS (basic)
R&D % of revenue
Peer median (20 companies): 9.9% · 18 with data
Scale
Revenue
Operating income
Net income
R&D
Capex
Free cash flow
Net cash / net debt
Shares outstanding
| Metric | KLA | Tokyo Electron | Peer median(20 companies) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valuation | |||
| Market cap | Leader. | ||
| Trailing P/Elower is better | — | ||
| P/Slower is better | — | ||
| Growth | |||
| Revenue growth | Leader. | 46.5%18 with data | |
| Profitability | |||
| Gross margin | Leader. | 61.9%19 with data | |
| Operating margin | Leader. | 36.8% | |
| Net margin | Leader. | 30.7% | |
| Diluted EPS | — | ||
| EPS (basic) | — | ||
| R&D % of revenue | 9.9%18 with data | ||
| Scale | |||
| Revenue | Leader. | ||
| Operating income | Leader. | ||
| Net income | Leader. | ||
| R&D | |||
| Capex | — | ||
| Free cash flow | — | ||
| Net cash / net debt | — | ||
| Shares outstanding | |||
Valuation
- Calculated Price ÷ last four reported quarters of diluted EPS. Loss-making companies show N/M.
View sources (1)
- KLA: KLA Corporation 10-K FY2026 · FY2026 (ended 30 Jun 2026, = TTM) · published 6 Aug 2026
Not shown: Tokyo Electron: No dated market figure stored.
- Calculated Market cap ÷ trailing-twelve-month revenue.
View sources (1)
- KLA: KLA Corporation 10-K FY2026 · FY2026 (ended 30 Jun 2026, = TTM) · published 6 Aug 2026
Not shown: Tokyo Electron: No dated market figure stored.
Growth
- Calculated Change versus the same period a year earlier.
View sources (2)
- KLA: KLA Corporation Reports Fiscal 2027 First Quarter Results :: KLA Corporation (KLAC) · Q1 FY2027 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Tokyo Electron: Summary of Consolidated Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended September 30, 2026 (Japanese GAAP); quarter derived from cumulative figures · Q2 FY2027 · published 30 Oct 2026
Profitability
- Calculated Gross profit ÷ revenue, GAAP/IFRS unless labelled otherwise.
View sources (2)
- KLA: KLA Earnings Shareholder Letter Q1 FY27 · Q1 FY2027 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Tokyo Electron: Summary of Consolidated Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended September 30, 2026 (Japanese GAAP); quarter derived from cumulative figures · Q2 FY2027 · published 30 Oct 2026
- Calculated Operating income ÷ revenue, GAAP/IFRS unless labelled otherwise.
View sources (2)
- KLA: KLA Earnings Shareholder Letter Q1 FY27 · Q1 FY2027 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Tokyo Electron: Summary of Consolidated Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended September 30, 2026 (Japanese GAAP); quarter derived from cumulative figures · Q2 FY2027 · published 30 Oct 2026
- Calculated Net income ÷ revenue for the same period (Silicon Analytica calculation unless the company states it).
View sources (2)
- KLA: KLA Corporation Reports Fiscal 2027 First Quarter Results :: KLA Corporation (KLAC) · Q1 FY2027 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Tokyo Electron: Summary of Consolidated Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended September 30, 2026 (Japanese GAAP); quarter derived from cumulative figures · Q2 FY2027 · published 30 Oct 2026
- Calculated R&D ÷ revenue for the same period.
View sources (2)
- KLA: KLA Corporation Reports Fiscal 2027 First Quarter Results :: KLA Corporation (KLAC) · Q1 FY2027 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Tokyo Electron: Summary of Consolidated Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended September 30, 2026 (Japanese GAAP); quarter derived from cumulative figures · Q2 FY2027 · published 30 Oct 2026
Scale
- Calculated Reported revenue for the stated period.
- Calculated ≈US$ for non-US$ reporters uses the stored conversion for each value; reporting-currency figures are in the table view.
View sources (2)
- KLA: KLA Corporation Reports Fiscal 2027 First Quarter Results :: KLA Corporation (KLAC) · Q1 FY2027 · published 28 Oct 2026
- Tokyo Electron: Summary of Consolidated Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended September 30, 2026 (Japanese GAAP); quarter derived from cumulative figures · Q2 FY2027 · published 30 Oct 2026
Revenue mix
KLA
Loading…
Tokyo Electron
Loading…
Each company's own classification and latest fiscal year with a stored split; categories differ between companies and are never added together.
Period ends — KLA: 30 Sep 2026 · Tokyo Electron: 30 Sep 2026. Valuation multiples remain trailing.
Copper underline: the leader among values for comparable periods. Higher is better, except P/E and P/S, where the lower positive multiple leads. R&D, capex, employees and shares have no leader. Peer median uses the latest quarter of the 20 covered companies and is shown for ratios only. “—” means neither the figure nor its inputs are stored; hover or tap for the missing input. Values marked Calculated are Silicon Analytica calculations from stored reported figures.
How to read this comparison
Business models. These companies share the equipment model and are broadly comparable, subject to product mix and definitions. KLA supplies production or test equipment and services; customer investment and installed-base demand drive revenue; Tokyo Electron supplies production or test equipment and services; customer investment and installed-base demand drive revenue.
Cyclicality. KLA (equipment) · Tokyo Electron (equipment): earnings are sensitive to capacity, utilisation and the investment or demand cycle. Trailing multiples can be distorted by peak or trough earnings.
Accounting and periods. Latest reported quarter ends — KLA: 2026-09-30 · Tokyo Electron: 2026-09-30. Each value retains its period, status and source; adjusted measures remain separate. Same-mode periods within 100 days are compared; valuation multiples remain trailing.
More comparisons
ASML vs Tokyo ElectronLam Research vs KLALam Research vs Tokyo ElectronNVIDIA vs AMDASML vs Applied MaterialsArm Holdings vs SynopsysTSMC vs Samsung ElectronicsMicron vs SK hynixIntel vs AMDNVIDIA vs Broadcom
Silicon Analytica